What Can We Learn from the Aceh Peace Process in Indonesia?
May 29, 2009 by
With war and gruesome internal conflicts still taking tolls and huge resources in a number of developing countries, the D-8 Secretary General shared his concern and plead to leaders in the respected countries to seek peaceful solution to the conflict, thus enabling them to focus and improve their economic development to progress to higher level in the global economy.*)
‘”We must build dikes of courage to hold back the flood of fear… That old law about “an eye for an eye” leaves everybody blind… The time is always right to do the right thing… Peace is not merely a distant goal that we seek, but a means by which we arrive at that goal.” (Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.)
Lately, news on TV have been shattering me deep inside. We’ve been bombarded with the heartbreaking drama of the battle between the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and the Government of Sri Lanka. Tens of thousand peoples from both sides have been dead since the war broke out in the mid 1970s until now. And hundreds, if not thousands more, have also been killed in the final fragment of the drama in May 2009. What stroke me the hardest is to see how the lives of ordinary peoples, like children and women, are afflicted by the war, loosing every tiny chance of their lives to take on and watching the lives of their loved ones drifting apart just before their very own eyes. We’ve seen the “flood of fear” in the eyes of thousands of innocent refugees trapped in this ethno-nationalism conflict that carved a painful story of a developing country that is supposed to build the country better for their people.
Living in Istanbul, Turkey, I have also been deeply moved by similar drama occasionally aired by the Turkish TV stations. Each time I see news where the mothers, fathers, wives, children, and families of a young fallen soldier cried and mourn over their beloved son in the fights against the PKK, my heart cries. As a human being, my heart also grieves when I imagine the feeling of the casualty from the other side, as they were also fighting for what they believe in, and also prayed to the same God as the soldiers they are fighting against. These scenes—which are not uncommon in developing countries—only left me with a dark and gloomy feeling of sadness and grief.
This depressing feeling caused by this type of internal conflict were also present during the years I experienced in Indonesia, where war broke out between the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) and the Government of Indonesia since mid of 1970s. It was not a conflict stemmed because the GAM demands the application of Islamic syari’ah in their region—which had been mistakenly identified by many parties in Jakarta, but instead a genuine case of centralistic injustice that were utterly felt by some Acehnese from their fellow Indonesian brothers.
But thank God, finally after a long, tireless peace process efforts, Indonesia succeded to harvest a lasting peace deal with GAM in 2005 in Helsinki, Finland, which was mediated by the former Finland President, and the laureate of the Nobel Peace Prize, Martti Ahtisaari. And with this regard, I was lucky to have experienced collaboratively accompanying the then President of Indonesia, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (who goes popularly in Indonesia with his initial, SBY), during the early stage of the whole process to seek peaceful ways to end the war.
Under the administration of the former Indonesian President Megawati, in 2002-2004, SBY was the Coordinating Minister for Political and Security Affairs. He took a decisive action to established the Aceh Desk under his office as an effort to solve the security affairs and peace process in Aceh region. Indonesia is a huge country with 230 million people. Geographically, it spans from east to west in almost the same area from Washington D.C (east) to San Francisco (west) of the USA. While from north to the south, it is almost the same length as from Moscow, Russia, to Barcelona of Spain. However, although Indonesian belong to one nation, Bangsa Indonesia, and to one language, Bahasa Indonesia, with the Moslem majority, yet Indonesia has more than 300 ethnics groups, which within the richness of diversity could potentially pose a threat of conflict if managed by inaccurate policies.
Eventhough coming from military background, where he graduated as best cadet from the Military Academy and later on successfully served as army general in the Indonesian Army, SBY is fact is a modern military reformer. His ideas of reformation within the National Indonesian Military (TNI) —especially the one to reduce military involvement in politics—just after the end of the Suharto regime rule were often cited as a brillliant steps. He had been the strongest believer from the very beginning of the establishment of the Aceh Desk, where I was an active member, that the peace solution was the best choice, compared to military operation. He knew that he had to seek balance of his role as Coordinating Minister of Political and Security Affairs, in between his military professional colleagues, who were once had very influential role in Indonesian politics and privileged during Suharto regime, and the demand of Indonesian people for reformation and true democracy. He also knew that he had to balance the influence of the global world’s trend on democracy and human rights, vis-à-vis harsh domestic nationalist faction in the parliement that were voicing objections against the plans to have peace dialogue and negotiation with the GAM, because the two parties: the Republic of Indonesia and the GAM were viewed as unequal by law.
The main leading policy that was used as rule of thumb in the peace process was that whatever the GAM would request in negotiation, would be heard symphatetically by the Indonesian Government, and would be given the highest attention and shown genuine willingness to implement it. However, the request from the GAM should be made under one major prerequisite that the peace, shall be sought within the brotherhood of the Unitary Republic of Indonesia, and never as an independent country.
I joined SBY as Deputy Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs in the first important stage of the peace process in Tokyo, October 2003. Facilitated by the Japanese Government, it was the first international meeting on Aceh Peace Dialogue, attended by delegates from the USA, a number of EU countries, Islamic countries, UN, international organizations and international financial organization such as IMF, the World Bank, and ADB. The meeting was successful, in the way that we were convinced that the world stance on this matter are clear, that they will support the Indonesian Government effort as long as we are honestly willing to enter into peaceful solution with GAM, and they pledged to build Aceh once the peace is achieved. This case was different than the separatism process of East Timor from Indonesia (1998), when the international opinion was strong favor of an independent East Timor state.
In the night before the final meeting in Tokyo, in that Ramadhan month, SBY woke me and other member of Indonesian delegates up to have sahur (early breakfast done by moslem in order to fast during Ramadhan) together, and asked that we pray to God—the very same God that GAM members are also believed in—that the war will be resolved peacefully, and violence will be stopped once for all in Aceh region. I should add, that a firm believer in God, is another trait that has won this General a lot of sympathy in Indonesia.
From Tokyo, facilitated by the Switzerland-based Henry Dunant Center for Humanitarian Dialogue, we went off to Geneva to meet the GAM delegates to talk over the Cessation of the Hostility Agreement (COHA). It is important to note that this was the first time the Government of Indonesia, internationally and officially had direct negotiation on peace process with the GAM, which is controlling the movement from their headquarter in Stockholm, Sweden.
It is worthy of note, that an hour before the negotiation started in Geneva, a high ranking military official called from Aceh, informing that they were already in Aceh and had been in the very strategic maneuver position to terminate all the GAM leaders and their fighters in the battle field. They believed that, if SBY agreed, they could take on military operation right away, and the Government could win the war, and therefore negotiation with the GAM in Geneva was not necessary. The respond from SBY was very clear-cut: the military operation is pointless and should be avoided; peace process should be set to proceed.
The Geneva peace meeting resulted in the very first officially agreement between the Indonesian Government and GAM, which was called COHA, although it was far from perfect. Though it has started to grow the seeds of trust between the both parties, the different perspective that has been growing on both sides within the long years of conflict were still tremendously huge to cope. For example, there were differences in the agreement on how GAM would render and control their weaponry; as well as on the reduction of military bases and pulling out of TNI soldiers from Aceh. However, followed by international observers on the COHA, this peace agreement had shown the good faith to the GAM side that Indonesian Government was very serious and willing to end the long and bitter conflict through peaceful ways.
The two international peace processes led by SBY in Tokyo and Geneva was geared into presidential campaign of SBY in 2004, where he pledged that the Aceh conflict will potentially be solved in a humanitarian and peaceful way had he elected President. He delivered that promise in 2005, and facilitated by Marti Ahtisaari, the lasting peace deal between Indonesian Government and the GAM was finally inked.
By these fragments of peace process in Aceh, I was reminded of what Dr Martin Luther King Jr. stated on the strong willingness of us to have a dream on peace and how to make it happens. He said, “We must build dikes of courage to hold back the flood of fear… That old law about “an eye for an eye” leaves everybody blind… The time is always right to do the right thing… Peace is not merely a distant goal that we seek, but a means by which we arrive at that goal.” Indeed, leaders of developing countries should have courage to allow, and make peace to happen. This courage will “hold back the flood of fear” of our people from the violence and wars. Now, can the leaders in developing countries learn this courage from the Aceh Peace Process?
If recently, the TIME Magazine had selected President Yudhoyono (SBY) among one of 100 world influential leaders, besides US President Barrack Obama and others, I believe it was a justified selection, and he deserved it.
Photosource: Xinhua Photo, ABC Net.au, D-8
*Personal opinion of D-8 Secretary General, Dipo Alam.



























